Second Passports

Governments’ Use of Citizenship Revocation as a Strategic Tool

Concept art of an article about Citizenship Revocation: American Flag (AI Art)

From Passport Seizure to Citizenship Revocation

Governments have significant authority in dealing with individuals suspected of terrorism or treason, often resorting to extreme measures such as seizing passports and revoking citizenship.

These actions can leave individuals stateless and vulnerable, paving the way for cooperating governments to carry out lethal operations without the burden of legal proceedings such as trials or the presumption of innocence.

From the government’s viewpoint, this strategy is very useful. You lose your passport and any diplomatic protections your country extends to its citizens. You must also apply for a visa to re-enter your own country.

UK’s Aggressive Application of Citizenship Revocation

The United Kingdom has been particularly assertive in employing citizenship revocation as a tool.

In just seven years, the UK has stripped citizenship from at least 42 individuals, including five who were born in Britain.

Two have already been killed in US drone strikes, and a third was secretly deported to the US.

Could Citizenship Revocation Happen in the US?

From the government’s standpoint, having the ability to revoke the citizenship of an “enemy of the state” is an immensely useful power.

A century ago, during World War I, the United States utilized this authority to strip German immigrants considered disloyal of their citizenship. But in a landmark 1958 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that citizenship deprivation cannot be used as a punishment.

For individuals born in the US, their citizenship cannot be revoked unless they voluntarily renounce it. Naturalized citizens can only lose their citizenship if they obtained it fraudulently or if they:

  • Refuse to testify before Congress within 10 years of naturalization.
  • Join a subversive organization within 5 years of naturalization.
  • Are dishonorably discharged from the military, if military service was the basis for citizenship acquisition.

Yet, a proposed 2010 law aimed to revoke citizenship from individuals—including native-born Americans—engaging in or materially supporting hostilities against the United States. This legislative move aims to circumvent the controversial policy of assassinating US citizens, which has already been implemented. The Obama administration acknowledged the drone strike killings of at least four US citizens, including a 16-year-old boy.

Furthermore, under the Obama administration’s doctrine, hundreds of dual nationals traveling outside the US have had their US passports revoked, leaving them unable to return and potentially subject to assassination.

Citizenship Revocation: Legal and Societal Implications

It’s challenging for many to fathom engaging in “hostilities” against the US government. But consider the definition of “terrorism” under US law:

  • Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law.
  • Appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.

On the surface, these definitions definitely look like what most of us conceive of terrorism. But consider this scenario: You’re attending a political protest where the crowd becomes unruly, resulting in damage to a local bank and harm to a bank teller. In such cases, participants could be branded as terrorists.

Once classified as a terrorist by the government, individuals face severe consequences. Authorities can seize and forfeit all their assets, regardless of any connection to terrorism. They can also detain individuals indefinitely without charge and even resort to lethal force.

Broader Trends and Precautionary Measures

The global trend is clear. Governments are increasingly using passport revocation and the withdrawal of nationality as weapons against their political adversaries.

Given these realities, getting a second passport and nationality as a safeguard against potential state actions appears prudent.

Need Help?

Since 1984, we’ve helped more than 15,000 customers and clients protect their wealth using proven, low-risk planning. In some cases, this also includes helping them get a second passport or residency. To see if our planning is right for you, please book a free no-obligation call with one of our Associates. You can do that here.

On another note, many clients first get to know us by accessing some of our well-researched courses and reports on important topics that affect you.

Like How to Go Offshore in 2024, for example. It tells the story of John and Kathy, a couple we helped from the heartland of America. You’ll learn how we helped them go offshore and protect their nestegg from ambulance chasers, government fiat and the decline of the US Dollar… and access a whole new world of opportunities not available in the US. Simply click the button below to register for this free program.

About The Author

Need Help?

We have 40+ years experience helping Americans move, live and invest internationally…

Need Help?

We have 40+ years experience helping Americans move, live and invest internationally…

As Featured on

Get our latest strategies delivered straight to your inbox for free.

Get Our Best Plan B Strategies Right to Your Inbox.

The Nestmann Group does not sell, rent or otherwise share your private details with third parties. Learn more about our privacy policy here.

The Basics of Offshore Freedom

Read these if you’re mostly or very new to the idea of going offshore

What it Really Takes to Get a Second Passport

A second passport is about freedom. But how do you get one? Which one is best? And is it right for you? This article will answer those questions and more…

How to Go Offshore
in 2024

[CASE STUDY] How we helped two close-to-retirement clients protect their nest egg.

Nestmann’s Notes

Our weekly free letter that shows you how to take back control.