If you’re a U.S. citizen or long-term permanent resident (“green card” holder), you have a unique responsibility: you must pay tax on your worldwide income, even if you live outside the United States. Not to mention capital gains tax, gift tax, and estate tax.
Numerous additional obligations come with U.S. citizenship or permanent resident status. For instance, you must make detailed disclosures of your non-U.S. investments annually to the IRS and U.S. Treasury. The Treasury may share the information it collects with almost any U.S. or foreign government or police agency.
You face additional tax pitfalls with reference to your non-U.S. investments and business activities. U.S. tax provisions for interests in non-U.S.-registered mutual funds, controlling interests in non-U.S. corporations, and interests in non-U.S. trusts are but three examples of the many “tax landmines” that U.S. taxpayers may inadvertently detonate.
A rapidly growing number of U.S. citizens and permanent residents have fought back the only way they legally can—by giving up their green card, or their U.S. citizenship and passport. In 2011, IRS records show that at least 1,788 people went through this process of “expatriation.” That’s almost eight times more than the number of people who expatriated in 2008, and more than the total for 2007, 2008 and 2009 combined.
However, a much larger number of non-resident U.S. citizens and green card holders aren’t even aware of their ongoing obligation to comply with U.S. tax and reporting requirements. An estimated seven million U.S. citizens live outside the United States, yet only a few hundred thousand of them file U.S. tax returns. One reason for this widespread ignorance is that it’s relatively easy to be born a U.S. citizen. For instance, you’re a U.S. citizen if you were born within the geographic boundaries of the United States, even if your parents were not U.S. citizens at the time. In most cases, you’re also a U.S. citizen if you were born outside the United States, and at least one parent was a U.S. citizen or green card holder.
Starting around 2008, the IRS began to enforce these rules much more vigorously, especially with respect to non-resident U.S. citizens. For instance, in Panama, armed IRS agents now roam the countryside looking for non-compliant U.S. taxpayers living or doing business there. In Austria, I recently learned of the IRS calling a U.S. citizen’s unregistered phone number to remind her of her tax and reporting obligations.
Want to Become Compliant? Get Ready to Write a Big Check
Here’s how it worked in one case related to me. A Mexican citizen, now well past retirement age, grew up in a tiny town in Mexico near the U.S. border. At the time of his birth, the town lacked any medical facilities, so when his mother went into labor, his parents drove to the nearest hospital, which happened to be just inside the U.S. border.
Fast forward 70 or so years, and this gentleman was longing for some relief from hot Mexican summers. So, he did what countless other wealthy Mexicans have done—he purchased a condo in San Diego. At closing, he encountered a strange anomaly. The closing documents listed him as a U.S. citizen. He tried to correct what he believed to be a mistake, but the broker assured him the documents were correct. Since he was born in the United States, he was indeed a U.S. citizen.
Our hero thought that was the end of it, but when he arrived in San Diego for the summer, he received a notice from the Internal Revenue Service. The notice informed him that he was obligated to file U.S. tax returns. And there was no record of him filing a U.S. tax return for the preceding three years. The notice invited him to respond immediately.
A few days later, he drove over to the local IRS office to see if he could resolve the situation. After a brief conversation, he was shocked to learn that the IRS had already commenced an examination. The agent started using terms such as “willful failure to file,” “criminal penalties,” and “jeopardy assessment.”
At this point, our hero hired a criminal tax defense attorney. He spent about $100,000 in legal fees, and eventually received a notice from the IRS informing him that he wouldn’t face criminal penalties. Still, he had to pay 25% of the peak value of his unreported non-U.S. accounts for the period 2003-2010. Unfortunately for him, the value of these accounts fell about 35% in the global economic turmoil of 2008-2009. The accounts that were once worth $2 million are now worth about $1.3 million. Nonetheless, he paid a $500,000 penalty to avoid criminal prosecution.
In addition, he had to file six years of past due tax returns and information returns disclosing his interests in Mexican corporations and other Mexican entities. These returns had to be prepared according to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Procedures (GAAP), which means that the Mexican financial statements for each year had to be converted to U.S. GAAP. That expense cost him an additional $50,000.
To tally things up: our hero’s total cost of accidental U.S. citizenship: $650,000. Total benefit of U.S. citizenship: none.
Needless to say, this Mexican gentleman filed a formal petition with the State Department to surrender his U.S. citizenship and expatriate. That eliminates any future U.S. tax or reporting obligations on non-U.S. income or property, but doesn’t affect his past obligations.
Americans Now Locked Out of Non-U.S. Investments
At the same time, it has become much more difficult for anyone with even the most remote connection to the United States to invest or do business offshore. Recently, I met with a U.S. citizen who is also a citizen of another country. He and his wife plan to move back to that country to retire.
On his last visit to that country, he tried to open a bank account. To his surprise—and horror—the first document the banker gave him was a 10-question survey asking him to disclose all connections to the United States. Even a single “yes” answer could disqualify the applicant from opening an account. Indeed, citizens of this country who have never traveled to the United States must now complete this form when opening an account at this bank. Dozens of other clients have reported similar difficulties.
For all these reasons, I think the 1,788 expatriations the IRS reported in 2011 is only the beginning of a much larger trend. Indeed, I’m surprised the number isn’t 10 times or even 100 times larger.
The Many Benefits of Expatriation
Expatriation is a major decision. It requires that you have a satisfactory passport and citizenship from another country. It also means that you no longer have the automatic right to live and work in the United States. Even for brief visits, you’ll need to obtain a visa, unless your non-U.S. passport qualifies you for visa-free entry.
The payoff, however, is immense. Once you expatriate, you no longer have any obligation to pay tax on your non-U.S. income, nor file any reporting forms to the IRS or U.S. Treasury with respect to your non-U.S. investments. You also eliminate all the offshore investment restrictions now imposed on U.S. citizens or green card holders. Plus, you’ll no longer be expected to adhere to the numerous embargoes the United States has declared against its self-declared enemies (e.g., Cuba).
Our firm has helped dozens of U.S. citizens and green card holders permanently and legally eliminate future U.S. tax and reporting obligations through the process of expatriation. We can even help you obtain a second passport, if you don’t have one already. Contact us today for a consultation.
Copyright © 2012 by Mark Nestmann
What happens to any pension or social security benefits? How about Ira withdrawals if one expatriates. How is that handled? If one spouse expatriates and one doesn’t, and the one left files married but separetaly, does the one filing have to give up info on the expatriated spouse? Many thanks for your help.
Dan, these questions are detailed enough that you may want to pick up a copy of my BILLIONAIRE’S LOOPHOLE report in our bookstore, which answers them.
Hi, Mark. I am US citizen. If I got a Commonwealth of Dominica passport would it qualify me for visa-free entry into USA? And if so, how long could I remain? Regards, John
John, no there is no visa-free entry to the USA with a Dominica passport. Also as long as you remain a US citizen you need to use a US passport to enter/leave the USA.
Mark:
I have used you for advice. Great article but the question always come up where is a safe place to live in a world that is getting ready to suffer a major financial break down, including the US.
Thank you, Doug. The question of where to live is obviously an important one. I think the safest countries are those without an entitlement mentality, such as Singapore. I wouldn’t be surprised if the US actually turns out to be one of the safer countries to live in going forward, especially outside major cities.
What is the effect on US social security payments once expatriated? Will the US still pay those?
Tom, in most cases expatriates are eligible to Social Security payments. The payments are subject to a withholding tax of 25.5%, unless a lower rate applies under a treaty between the United States and the country in which the expatriate is tax-resident.
Can you please answer John’s question regarding time allowed in USA for an expatriate? If one completely disengages from USA but gets a Visa for periodic visits …..how long can we stay in the US at one time before triggering the IRS monster? thank you
Chris, there are both immigration and tax rules to consider. Under most visa classifications you can stay up to 90 days in the USA as a visitor. Once you exceed 182 days of physical residence in the USA in any one year, or an average of more than 121 days/year over a four-year period, you are “deemed resident” for US tax purposes. This can be extended to 182 days either by a tie-breaker provision in a tax treaty or if you can prove a “closer connection” to another country other than the USA.
—–Original Message—–
From: Marvin Van horn
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:21 PM
To: assetpro@nestmann.com
Subject: Re: Lew Rockwell Post on Expatriation
Mark…
The strangest thing about D. S, as ao political appointment, he was appointed by Bush! Those that think one partisan side or the other is going to listen or change this jihad, is dreaming or smoking something. Maybe I should take up smoking something…
I know my letter to Shulman has little likely hood of making any difference. I have written 3 now, and several others to his underlings. I do know the TAS listens to this, and they have a copy.
If Obama wanted to do something right, he would appoint Nina Olson to replace Shulman, but then the Republicans would object, just to object.
Some of this just makes me feel better to express it, even though I know from practical matter D. S. will retire at the end of his term, and take up a high paying attorney job consulting and helping clients/victims of his own programs negotiate their way through the hell process he created.. So it goes…
mvh
________________________________
From: Mark Nestmann
To: ‘Marvin Van horn’
Cc: assetpro@nestmann.com
Sent: Thursday, 26 April 2012 5:08 PM
Subject: RE: Lew Rockwell Post on Expatriation
Marvin,
Probably the saddest thing I do in my occupation is listen to stories like this all the time. If it’s not the government going after someone, it’s a vindictive ex-spouse, or someone who made a mistake much earlier in life and is now trapped in the USA due to an old felony conviction, etc.
The questions you raise in your letter to D.S. are certainly relevant. I have no confidence that there is any real concern over the answers. D.S. is a political appointee.. His job is to make political points for Obama’s reelection or whoever else is in the driver’s seat…nothing else.
Best//Mark
===================================
—–Original Message—–
From: Marvin Van horn
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 2:50 PM
To: assetpro@nestmann.com
Subject: Re: Lew Rockwell Post on Expatriation
Thanks Mark…
That sounds about right… A lot of folks that didn’t understand what was happening, and how the OVDI would be conducted. They got into these programs because of the IRS hyperbolic threats. They should NOT have been in the program in the first place. In spite of warnings to the contrary, quiet disclosures or compliance going forward would have been best for me, if they wanted to be compliant with the law. But again, not knowing all the facts, it is difficult to generalize too much….
I frame the argument about programs suitable for Homeland “Whales” that were actively evading taxes with UBS type secret accounts, and Minnows who just got netted and ground up in the fertilizer factory to make Shulman’s Stats
look good… Don’t get me started… LOL The IRS should have made an
easy way for benign failures to easily come into compliance, if that was the goal, with out this onerous “one size fits all” program. It is government incompetence of the highest order.
I have published an open letter to Shulman here and on Jack Townsends blog here I know I am too wordy….but it spells it out pretty well, I think.
Anyway, thanks for your FATCA link. I will see if there isn’t somewhere we can highlight at Isaac Brock.
Also, assume you are aware of DATCA… my acronym for the domestic version of FATCA. I posted something before, and here is my latest.
Here is the bigger picture I think.
FATCA begets GATCA (or the global version of FATCA.
That is the connection that no one in the media has picked up. Hell, you can hardly get the MSM to even talk about FATCA, let alone the consequences of what I think is coming.
Enough of this. You obviously know the subjects pretty well.
Thanks again for your time and interest. You are certainly welcome to comment at Isaac Brock anytime.
All the best,
mvh
________________________________
From: Mark Nestmann
To: ‘Marvin Van horn’
Cc: assetpro@nestmann.com
Sent: Tuesday, 24 April 2012 9:02 AM
Subject: RE: Lew Rockwell Post on Expatriation
Marvin,
The attorney who related this story to me was brought in rather late in the
game. I think the Mexican victim of the jihad (excellent characterization)
either tried to do the OVDI on his own or had someone incompetent help him.
I’m not sure which, but in any event by the time he contacted the attorney
who reached out to me he had already incurred very considerable costs.
Perhaps some of them can be recovered through competent legal
representation.
Feel free to post my responses.
Your own story sounds interesting, although I only had a chance to read the
first few paragraphs of your account at this time.
I have written extensively on FATCA in my blog. Here’s a recent article with
links to some other ones.
http://nestmann.com/form-8938-another-nail-in-the-coffin-of-offshore-financial-privacy-part-i/
A very bad law, to be sure.
Best//Mark
—–Original Message—–
From: Marvin Van horn
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 5:33 PM
To: assetpro@nestmann.com
Subject: Re: Lew Rockwell Post on Expatriation
Hey Mark….
Thanks so much for responding. I appreciate your forth rightness, candor
and responsiveness.. You are unique in that regard.
There are many of us that understand the current IRS jihad in some painful
detail and how the processes are working or not. Of course we have
opinions, but I personally try not to be too hyperbolic as I don’t want to
be dismissed out of hand. It is important to get stories right, as you
don’t need any embellishment to tell this story. It truly is stranger than
fiction when it comes to the last 3 years of IRS actions. I often fail,
with my own characterizations and representations, however.. I try to stay
mindful of that. However, frustration overcomes level headed and measured
communication at times. It is hard to get attention without being hyperbolic
or partisan
Important point I would like you to understand. We are not Tax protesters or
Tax evaders, or Sovereign Nation types. If I would characterize the group
of bloggers at Isaac Brock, it would be “International Tax
Complexity/Stupidity Protesters”.. And there is a lot of stupidity around
these days related to offshore accounts, Citizenship taxation, and IRS
practices to “improve” compliance.
I understand the outlines of what the attorney told you, and something might
have been lost in translation. There are some details that I am skeptical
about, and don’t make sense in light of what we know, however, the IRS has
been amazing in their willingness to take BIG Penalties from people like
this dual citizen Mexican you mentioned. If that happened, it borders on
criminal, but then we may not really know all the facts.
If this actually happened, it borders on attorney malpractice if he failed
the client by not having him “Opt Out” of the OVDI or going to the TAS for
relief. I say that knowing that I DO NOT really have all the facts of the
situation. So, there could be good reasons I am not aware of.
If you are interested in a real story, mine has been well documented at
Isaac Brock. I know something about the so called Voluntary Disclosure
process. I am not as sympathetic a victim as a dual citizen Mexican, but
victim just the same. You are welcome to read it if you are a glutton for
punishment!
http://bit.ly/y5NQr4
Anyway, we appreciate any light that is shined on the misguided Citizenship
Taxation policies and nothing wrong with an informerical! I understand the
need to generate business. Keep it up!
If you don’t mind, and I will give you an opportunity to object, I would
like to post your response. You seem a stand up guy, and heaven knows we
need more like you that can clearly communicate about the issues that most
Americans care not one whit about!
BTW, what do you know about FATCA? That is a good blog topic for Lew
Rockwell.. We can certainly help you understand it if you don’t. I would
suggest that you start here… http://bit.ly/nlOAPV
Cheers and thanks again.
Marvin Van Horn
New Zealand
Blogging as Just Me
Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/FBAR_Compliant
________________________________
From: Mark Nestmann
To: ‘Marvin Van horn’
Cc: assetpro@nestmann.com
Sent: Monday, 23 April 2012 9:00 AM
Subject: RE: Lew Rockwell Post on Expatriation
Dear Marvin,
Thank you for your note. I recently discovered the Isaac Brock Society blog
and find it most interesting. I did see the articles you mention in the
email but appreciate you calling my attention to them.
The story of the elderly Mexican man I described in my blog was related to
me by one of his attorneys. It is my understanding from this attorney that
he did go through the OVDI. I’m not sure which one but I believe the
attorney said 25% in which case it would have been 2011.
Several of the posts cast doubt on the accuracy of the story, but I don’t
know any reason why the attorney would misrepresent the facts. Since I don’t
know the situation first-hand, I’m not in a position to answer the questions
your readers posed for additional details.
A couple people suggested that he could have walked away from the USA to
avoid paying up. I assume that the attorney he was working with insisted
that he become compliant before helping him expatriate. While expatriation
doesn’t affect past tax obligations, it can have the effect of making those
obligations more difficult to collect. Assisting someone with known and
unresolved tax issues to expatriate could potentially open up advisors to
civil and criminal charges by the IRS..
And yes, my blog is an infomercial. It’s free, and I have to get new clients
somehow!
All the best,
Mark
—–Original Message—–
From: Marvin Van horn
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 1:28 AM
To: info@nestmann.com
Subject: Lew Rockwell Post on Expatriation
Mark,
I just read your post on Lew Rockwell…
http://lewrockwell.com/nestmann/nestmann43.1.html
That is a story I know all too well..
Assume you saw this recent story at Reuters?
Special Report: Tax time pushes some Americans to take a hike
http://reut.rs/IGJ3Dx
or this last year
Taxpayers with overseas accounts seethe at penalties
http://reut.rs/uwDMt9
If you haven’t heard of Isaac Brock Society, I would encourage you to check
it out, as this blog is devoted solely to the subject…
We have just referenced your Rockwell post, and have some questions as to
the details of the story and why this Mexican didn’t take some other
actions.
http://isaacbrocksociety.com/2012/04/21/mark-nestmanns-story-of-a-mexican/
Thanks for your post but would like to hear more.
Best Regards
Marvin Van Horn
New Zealand.